Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Enterprise (CVN-80)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW - fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V as the name is simply that proposed by petitions (perhaps a WP:NOT needs to be added that says "Wikipedia is not to be used to canvass support for off-wiki initiatives...") The Bushranger One ping only 01:39, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

USS Enterprise (CVN-80)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Hull number CVN-80 does not yet exist and it has not been announced by the US Navy or US Department of Defense that it will be named Enterprise. &mdash; MrDolomite &bull; Talk 23:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Please see Gerald R. Ford class aircraft carrier, which contains seemingly more accurate, and cited, information. Borock (talk) 00:00, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete As above, the article for the class says this ship's name hasn't been assigned and that it won't exist until 2025 anyway. No need for a separate article until there's information specific to this ship. Dricherby (talk) 00:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Nick-D (talk) 08:41, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:CRYSTAL without prejudice to recreation once her keel is laid. Mjroots (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mjroots. Parsecboy (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.