Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS Enterprise NCC-1701-G


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Tito xd (?!?) 01:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

USS Enterprise NCC-1701-G
Fancruft. Plus there is no 1701-G on Memory Alpha. BJK 19:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Adding to nomination, as they are also part of the same non-notable PBeM game (suggest relisting under Scousers Fleet): A minor fanfic game with probably only a single group of participants fails WP:NOT on several levels. Ace of Risk 13:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Scousers Fleet
 * USS Lexington NCC-1709-B
 * USS Ambassador NCC-21702-A
 * USS Harwood NCC-42006
 * USS Illustrious NCC-21492
 * Imperial Storm Fleet


 * Delete fancruft... There is nothing canonical between NCC-1701-F & NCC-1701-J.--Isotope23 20:29, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Extending deletion opinion to all later included articles.--Isotope23 14:18, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete fancruft. Artw 21:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I think I remember deleteing Enterprise - H somewhere along the way but I can't find the discussion. --Pboyd04 00:15, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. or merge to Starship Enterprise. -- GWO
 * Delete - only appears in Scousers Fleet, which should probably also be up for AfD - actually all of those need looking at, as there seems to be a large proportion relating to an un-notable PBeM game (done). Ace of Risk 13:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - located one google reference, leading to this forum post - not good! Ace of Risk 21:55, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This is the same thing FASA got in trouble with Paramoutn over...making up their own hisotry of Star Trek. It is considered taboo among many fans to have a sim centered around the flagship of the Federation, let alone a future version. Lord_Hawk 16:19, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. TheRealFennShysa 17:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.