Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USS LIBERTY

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to USS Liberty incident -- Francs2000 | Talk 02:42, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

USS LIBERTY
keep it (unsigned vote, possibly by 70.104.132.28 considering this is his/her only contribution and it was done so anonymously)  ETA: Yup, definitely was that IP address. Thorns Among Our Leaves 01:27, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

Delete it! The attack on USS Liberty deserves an article which it has got (USS Liberty incident), but right now it's this is only a collection of quotes. Really, really substandard and redundant .--itpastorn 20:02, 17 July 2005 (UTC)

Delete it. Clearly partisan as well as redundant. Bozoid 21:36, 18 July 2005 (UTC)

Delete or Redirect. Why does wikipedia need to have case sensitive titles? What is gained by this? jucifer 06:30, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, POV fork, Wikiquote material at best. - Mustafaa 23:39, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Liberty (AGTR-5) Capitalistroadster 00:15, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also, please sign your votes. Thorns Among Our Leaves 01:23, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
 * did anyone consider transwiki to Wikiquote? Since it is a bunch of quotes... Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 03:44, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect USS Liberty (AGTR-5) --LouieS 15:56, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect USS Liberty incident --JIPrugh 15:00, 30 July 2005 (PST) I agree that this information should be redirected, but to the article on the USS Liberty incident. These quotes should not be deleted since they are very relevant to the controversy over whether or not the attack on the Liberty was accidental or not.
 * Merge quotes into the controversy section of USS Liberty incident and then redirect this page to USS Liberty (AGTR-5). The quotes are worth preserving (assuming they are validated) in the article on the incident.  The page title itself is more relevant to the ship and therefore should redirect there. Tobycat 05:51, 3 August 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.