Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US government position on invasion of Iraq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

US government position on invasion of Iraq
The result was   Delete. Icestorm815 •  Talk  23:37, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This topic is already described in Rationale for the Iraq War using reliable third-party publications. On the other hand, US government position on [the] invasion of Iraq is a poorly named soap-box for people to attack both the Bush administration and Democratic politicians who once believed Iraq retained extensive stockpiles of illicit weaponry. In addition, it cites self-published sources who claim Saddam Hussein trained the September 11 attackers. (e.g. HUSSEINANDTERROR.COM ). I do not see the point in keeping this article when the other page describes the U.S. government position so much better. Dynablaster (talk) 17:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: I knew this was a POV fork the second I saw the title. Ryan 4314   (talk) 18:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - POV fork, at least partly made up of original research. We already have a much better article on this topic. Robofish (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - POV fork. Nick-D (talk) 08:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as POV fork. Hekerui (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.