Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/USched


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:22, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

USched

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no references for notability, and essentially a manual page, not a WP article  DGG ( talk ) 20:11, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

The article was edited to included references to the official project repository page, including indication of milestones, roadmaps, licenses and portability. An History section was included that briefly (but will be extended in a near future) describe the history of the project. Also all technical details were moved into a Technical Details section.  Threadp 23:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:13, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. In response to 's statement on future edits, none of those add to the project's notability. This seems to be WP:PROMO &#8213; Padenton  &#124;&#9742; 18:26, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, sorry for this. After reading all the notability requirements, it's now clear that this project lacks of reliable secondary sources. Currently it's only being used for testing purposes and too young to have some material from other sources. I'll request an undelete in the future when some strong references can be included.  Threadp 18:41, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom, and my searches, and article's author, subject lacks substantial coverage from reliable sources. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 18:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per nom, the article's author, and the fact that I was unable to find sufficient coverage in reliable sources. Shanata (talk) 19:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.