Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UShip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 01:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

UShip



 * Keep - The main issue is notability and a google search for the term uship clearly establishes the notability of this company. better links have been placed in the article that establish the notability of this company. Article text can be fixed, but deletion is not necessary. Yes, I am biased because I wrote this article. But all this started after someone wrote the original text of the "criticisms" sections, which was described as a "waiver of liability" but is actually a negative point of view about the company, which is fine of course. Efalcao 18:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
 * A google search on elements of this editor's username and the name of the company clearly establishes that this editor works for the company. WP:AFD suggests that users with conflict of interest should not participate in deletion discussions. MKoltnow 18:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - This article is basically an advertisement for a company which fails to meet notability. MKoltnow 21:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as G11. JChap2007 23:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The article failed speedy delete (G11) on November 15, 2006. MKoltnow 23:54, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete advert - all of originator's contributions to Wikipedia are to this ad. B.Wind 01:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.