Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UTStarcom CDM1450


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 20:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

UTStarcom CDM1450

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

We don’t have individual articles for any other UTStarcom handsets and there does not seem to be anything notable about this one. Mccapra (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:36, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:37, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per lack of citations available via google. MidwestSalamander (talk) 14:06, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete—I would recommend redirect to UTStarcom, but for the fact that that article does not mention any individual handsets. On the other hand, if one wanted to have handsets mentioned in that article, albeit sourced from independent sources rather than self-published materials, there'd be nothing wrong with that.  This particular handset does not appear to be notable on its own. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 18:30, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable secondary sources here, and not even a claim of significance. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 22:15, 13 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.