Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UW Aquilae


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of largest stars. ✗ plicit  00:43, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

UW Aquilae

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:NASTRO and therefore not WP:GNG; hardly any coverage in reliable sources. Article likely only exists on the basis of it being a very large star.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer   09:33, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * CU Note: The main author was a sock - it would have been a candidate for G5 deletion had not done a fair bit of tidying up on the article - their thoughts on its retention or otherwise would probably be relevant.  Girth Summit  (blether)  09:57, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * keep there are sources that indicate its notable per ,--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 12:12, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Which ones? All the ones I could find are catalogues which do not establish notability.  SpaceImplorer ExplorerImplorer   15:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Comment: I did find a couple for studies that make mention of "UW Aql", but no more than a few sentences. I'm on the fence about this one. Praemonitus (talk) 19:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  00:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Can't redirect to List of largest known stars as that page is a redirect. At least when I edit Wikipedia, redirects show up as a different color font (green links) rather than articles (blue links). Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:21, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of largest known stars, where it is mentioned. This is fairly an obscure star, it doesn't has even a Henry Draper or HIP designation despite its modest brightness of 8.8. I was planning to redirect it to List of stars in Aquila, but it fails the criteria of inclusion for these lists.
 * InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 19:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Then redirect to List of largest stars because the name changed recently. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 11:18, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * redirect to List of largest stars which is the target of the redirect. Mangoe (talk) 05:08, 23 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of largest stars. User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 11:29, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.