Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/U of I Community Credit Union


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

U of I Community Credit Union

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Zero secondary sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT. Created as promo by single-purpose COI account. AusLondonder (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, United States of America,  and Illinois. AusLondonder (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. The entirety of the article is a blatant WP:COPYVIO, mostly verbatim copying and a little light paraphrasing from here and here. Not sure if speedy deletion can apply once AfD is launched but it meets the criteria. As for this AfD discussion, delete -- there is no independent, significant, reliable and secondary coverage of this credit union, so it fails WP:NORG. Dclemens1971 (talk) 02:08, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, articles at AfD can be speedily deleted if they meet the criteria. It appears that the article was previously speedily deleted as a copyvio and then recreated by the same SPA with slight tweaks. AusLondonder (talk) 12:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete - There's mundane news coverage but nothing that I would say gives rise to notability. I've declined the speedy deletion as the original version of the article looks like with was sufficiently different from the credit unions' web page.  But the article reads promotionally (not enough for speedy) and there's no point in fixing that wording as this is just not notable. -- Whpq (talk) 13:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete given the lack of readily available sources, fails WP:ORGCRIT.Dejaqo (talk) 16:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and for lack of WP:SIGCOV. Local news of a new VP or the like does not constitute significant coverage. Bearian (talk) 19:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.