Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uber-local food


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:29, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Uber-local food

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, a search turns up almost nothing outside of a single case study and promotional materials for a Seattle business Dexxtrall (talk) 17:09, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment, still weak but there is also an article using the term here. SailingInABathTub (talk) 13:39, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Appears to be an attempted WP:NEOLOGISM that never actually became the subject of wide spread use or discussion. There are a handful of places that use the term here and there, but any actual discussion of the concept is scant-to-nonexistent in them.  Rorshacma (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism in very limited use.  DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable neologism. I don't see enough usage to even justify a redirect to Local food; Google search is filled with Uber (company) topics.  The uses I find are just people using "uber" as a generic adjective, not as part of a specifically-defined term. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 17:24, 22 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.