Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uber Agency


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 10:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Uber Agency

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Spam. WholeEarth (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep/Rewrite Was made by an SPA. Tone is definitely not encyclopedic. They may be relevant if they have the revenue they claim. They are listed in that article that is referenced, I don't know if that is considered a reliable source or not. Seems perhaps more in need of a rewrite to me. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 16:54, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam, can't establish notability. OSbornarfcontributionatoration 03:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - I have done the source hunt. Found mentions in Campaign magazine:, , and the ref in the article: . Design Week reports one story (fully accessible here), a mention in the Yorkshire Evening Post and one in The Independent. None of these are more than mentions and aren't sufficient to show notability. Moreover, the only verifiable information we can state is that Uber is a Sheffield-based ad agency who have won a few awards. Fails WP:GNG and fails WP:CORP. Having tried to find sources, I will ask OSborn to reconsider. Bigger digger (talk) 00:33, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.