Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uber pownage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy close, delete, WP:SNOW. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Uber pownage

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Contested prod. Non-notable neologism, not the least bit encyclopedic. Strong delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Its a neologism. ~ DC (Talk&#124;Edits) 01:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete with extreme prejudice as soon as humanly possible. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to pwn. - Richard Cavell (talk) 02:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete without redirect, not notable. Hairhorn (talk) 03:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a G3, obvious misinformation as the author stated "Pownage or Uber arent every day words or really in the dictionary." Handschuh-talk to me 10:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm guessing the author really meant "pwn" but is not familiar with the more mainstream spelling (seeing as they don't mention it anywhere). Una LagunaTalk 13:17, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not worth a redirect. I agree with the above, this was apparently an attempt at another pwn article, but the author wasn't aware of the spelling. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:14, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NEO. Warrah (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete – blatant neologism. Borderline speedy delete (G5) if you wish to extend WP:BAN that far. I am quite certain the creator of the article is a sock puppet of . –MuZemike 17:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above, this concept is already sufficiently covered at Pwn.  Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 18:40, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.