Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uberisation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Gig worker. The term "gig economy" serves as a redirect to the said target. (non-admin closure) ASTIG️🙃  (ICE-T • ICE CUBE) 10:30, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Uberisation

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While this term has been used by reliable sources, it most often is used in quotes and is not a topic for an encyclopedia Country20 (talk) 03:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Comment: It seems to me that the article describes a process connected to the gig economy to a degree where it would be better to turn it into a redirect and merge some of its contents into a new section on that page, rather than keep them separated and live or completely remove the current page and the sources it uses. YuriNikolai (talk) 19:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Economics.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Merge to Gig economy This article has a lot of material that would be helpful in that article, and makes a lot more sense in that context. If this discussion ends in merge, please tag me and I will personally do it. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Oiyarbepsy – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 10:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge with Gig economy: Closely related to Gig economy, no reason for this to be separate. 15 (talk) 21:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.