Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubiquitous Telecommunication Technology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Ubiquitous Telecommunication Technology

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A7 was declined because the article creator contested on the talk page saying that it was part a subsidiary of Etisalat. There was no evidence offered for this, and I couldn't find any reliable sourcing that says this. In any case, this is a non-notable company that doesn't have coverage in sources, and because of the lack of association between the firm and the claimed parent company in sourcing, deletion appears to be the best option at this time. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:00, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:11, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 15:42, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete, I can say for sure this would not pass AfC. A non-notable corporation Eddie891 (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.