Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubisoft Chengdu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Ubisoft. ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  15:33, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Ubisoft Chengdu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I could not find significant coverage of the company in reliable sources. The two sources given are just interviews. I propose to redirect it to Ubisoft. Odie5533 (talk) 23:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge: then redirect to Ubisoft. Minimal content that can be covered in a section of the main article.► Philg88 ◄ ♦talk 03:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  23:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:14, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:27, 8 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Merge and redirect to Ubisoft. A deletion discussion isn't really necessary to do a merge and redirect, but here we are. The content of this article could be a section of the main article. Novusuna talk 20:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge to Ubisoft, which presently has only a short listing describing Ubisoft Chengdu. NorthAmerica1000 22:26, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.