Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ubuntu Buddhist Remix


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Ubuntu Buddhist Remix

 * – (View AfD)

Article relates to a discontinued version of Ubuntu. There doesn't appear to be significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject, so it doesn't comply with the WP:GNG. PhilKnight (talk) 21:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Calling this distro "discontinued" is on par with claiming that Red Hat and Ubuntu are discontinued distros. What the article suffers from, is that nobody has updated the changes in name, focus, and releases --- even when they refer to it in other Wikipedia articles. jonathon (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't saying Zenix was discontinued, merely the Ubuntu Buddhist Remix has been. The distos aren't the same - for example Zenix contains a large number of Buddhist related Firefox bookmarks, but doesn't contain scriptural study tools. PhilKnight (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Calling this distro "discontinued" is on par with claiming that Red Hat and Ubuntu are discontinued distros. What the article suffers from, is that nobody has updated the changes in name, focus, and releases --- even when they refer to it in other Wikipedia articles. jonathon (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I wasn't saying Zenix was discontinued, merely the Ubuntu Buddhist Remix has been. The distos aren't the same - for example Zenix contains a large number of Buddhist related Firefox bookmarks, but doesn't contain scriptural study tools. PhilKnight (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:30, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm not finding any sources, and that's a requirement to establish notability. -- Nuujinn (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, also find no sources. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 13:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.