Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uchhaishravas

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mgm|(talk) 21:43, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Uchhaishravas
Google yields 44 hits on this. Seems not notable. Inter 09:44, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Keep and cleanup. Hindu mythology. Google is not a good tool to judge whether it is notable or not. Transcription problems also have to be taken into account. / up+land 10:08, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep things from real mythologies, even if they get 0 hits. Uchaishravas might be a better spelling. Kappa 10:23, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, agree with Uppland. GRider\talk 18:45, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, minor character in Hindu mythology. Probably merge or mention in another Hindu article but I cant see this expanding into a full blown article without regurgitating the whole myth from elsewhere. Megan1967 00:42, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All mythological figures are notable and encyclopedic.--Centauri 03:21, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)