Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uckfield Community Technology College


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda wat's sup 21:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Uckfield Community Technology College
Delete because page is infringing on personal details of a private company 22:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC) &mdash;The preceding unsigned comment was added by Michaelritchie200 (talk &bull; contribs).
 * Speedy keep as silly nomination. The nominator created this article, but it does not means he owns it. --Ezeu 22:41, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep same as Ezeu--Adam [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px| ]](talk) 15:46, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Ezeu. --Ter e nce Ong (恭喜发财) 15:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing outstanding about this school which is "ranked 414th best school in the country" Ruby 15:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, No personal infringement, but article is of no general interest. --Regebro 16:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Another high school? Speedy keep. All editors voting 'delete' on high school articles would do well to familiarize themselves with WP:SCH. Also, the reason for nomination makes no sense at all. - Randwicked Alex B 16:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment just because a bunch of non-notable schools survived deletion votes in the past does not automatically make my vote invalid. Otherwise there would be a "Criteria_for_speedy_keep" with an item that said, "Any school".  Ruby 17:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * But high schools are notable. - Randwicked Alex B 17:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * There are some personal details in the history, but these could be removed through a selective history delete. Uppland 16:32, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I saw a few attacks on teachers, but noone's personal details? - Randwicked Alex B
 * Yes, that's what I meant. Even though the details were perhaps not very personal, there is no reason why the names should even be there. Wikipedia is not ratemyteachers.com. Uppland 16:47, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There's no reason to remove personal attacks from the history though. Yet, anyway? Who knows where this brave new world of wikilitigation will lead. - Randwicked Alex B 17:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to look actively for personal attacks in the history of articles, but when we stumble on them, we might as well get rid of them. Uppland 17:09, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, looks like an established secondary school. Kappa 17:26, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * keep yadayada WP:SCH. Jcuk 21:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Kappa Merchbow 00:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but just perhaps as a selective history edit. (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.