Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uconnect phone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''Speedy delete per being blatant advertising. No keep votes, even the admin who declined the original CSD seems to agree it is speedyable'''. Chillum 15:26, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Uconnect phone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Declining db-spam, taking to AfD, this is a judgment call. This is an option on every "2004 model year or newer Chrysler, Jeep, or Dodge", meaning that there may be a lot of owners out there who'd like to see an article about it, although the article as written is too promotional. Most hits on "uconnect" aren't referring to this product. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 16:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 16:34, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 16:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete it is written in an unencyclopedic promotional tone also it is not notable enough. I only found trivial mentions on google news. I also removed a large FAQ section which was a copyvio. More of the article may be a direct copy paste from somewhere, but I haven't found the source yet. --DFS454 (talk) 16:47, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

From the talk page of the article this is the creators input: the uconnect phone article was set up by myself as completely informational to the general population, and was not set up to promote a particular product in any manner. All of the Graphics/ Diagrams are completly self made and open for public usage.

thanks you for your time,

Regards,

Aaron --DFS454 (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No attempt to show notability. Written by user:Chryslerllc as advertising / user guide. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:07, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. Gah ... don't know how I missed the company username, it's usually the first thing I look at.  I'll  spamublock them when we're finished here. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If I had noticed, I would have speedied (sped?) the article. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 22:23, 3 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.