Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udaan Trust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW closure of WP:POINTy nomination. The Bushranger One ping only 04:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Udaan Trust

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable independent significant coverage, only a few passing mentions in news sources. NYyankees51 (talk) 20:09, 19 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Nom obviously didn't look for sources elsewhere or look at the sources in the article. It's the subject of an article in the Times of India, discussed briefly in a number of scholarly sources as well as the news sources mentioned, and the language barrier/systemic bias issue leads me to think there's more we can't access. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 00:36, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * keep one in a string of pointy noms by the same nominator. Difficult to assume good faith with so many unresearched pointy noms.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 02:34, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep There seems to be enough independent coverage to establish notability.  Tigerboy1966  02:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, appears to be WP:POINT violation by nominator. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.