Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udanchhoo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Udanchhoo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film, not even released yet. No claim of notability let alone references Jimfbleak - talk to me?  12:18, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 13:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Alts:
 * WP:INDAFD: Udanchhoo "Udanchoo" "Vipin Parashar" "Vishal V. Patil" "Rajniesh Duggal" "Saisha Sehgal" "Bruna Abdullah"
 * Hindi film = Hindi title:
 * alt spelling:
 * alt spelling:
 * director:
 * writer:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:


 * Keep Being unreleased is not the guiding issue for projects BEING filmed... coverage of production IS. In looking, we do know the film had its music launch last April, in May it was announced that actor Gautam Gulati opted out and was replaced by Rajneesh Duggal, and we do know filming has begun and they were shooting in Greater Noida where lead actor Duggal used 10 different looks. Yes the current stub is a poorly sourced, but so what?  When a film topic meets WP:NFF (paragraph 3), we do not delete it... Sorry  but we look first, determine if the topic is notable and not judge it for being WP:IMPERFECT, and then we allow it to remain and be improved over time and through use of the many available sources.  One editors opinion.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 21:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added a handful of references yesterday; subject meets WP:GNG. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 07:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for helping make it obvious that the TOPIC met inclusion criteria even before is was nominated for being WP:UGLY. What is far too often forgotten is that under WP:NRVE, WP:N and WP:HANDLE a article being unsourced is not nearly as important as sources being available for improvement. That's why in a community SO-FIX-IT does not mean DELETE-IT. Good job.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:37, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It meets WP:GNG.EyThink (talk) 11:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment above is the user's only wikipedia edit Jimfbleak - talk to me?  14:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Jim, they currently have 487 edits] here. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 15:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep, I'm seeing good deal of discussion among various types of references. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 16:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.