Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udom Jokrob


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 06:14, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Udom Jokrob

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A BLP sourced only to a permanently dead link. No indication of WP:GNG or WP:SPORTBASIC being met. My own Thai searches led me to Blog Gang, however, this is only a passing mention followed by an image caption. In addition, this seems to be WP:USERGENERATED so would not meet WP:RS standards anyway. There are more blog posts by the same user here and here that also mention Jokrob in passing but, in any case, even if this were an acceptable source, we would need the coverage to be significant and addressing Jokrob in detail, which isn't the case. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Already PROD'd so not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:54, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Thailand.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:09, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 18:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Source in article is primary and dead, I searched for Udom Jokrob and อุดม จอกรบ, I tried Udom Chokrob thinking this might be an alt, but BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs require strong sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk  22:56, 13 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.