Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udyogamandal School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. - Mailer Diablo 01:12, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Udyogamandal School
Wiki page looks like a brochure. I recommend deletion. PeaSea 06:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. &mdash;Crypticbot (operator) 15:33, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. --Aucaman 19:45, 5 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions.  -- Tintin 21:03, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep for reasons expressed at Schools/Arguments. There is nothing brochure-like at all about this article, it is neutral and factual.  Silensor 22:19, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep per the proposal at WP:SCH: this article passes on all counts (verifiable content, third-party references, and a picture). It even counters systemic bias!  I never thought I'd be voting "strong keep" on a school stub, but that day has finally come.  &mdash; Haeleth Talk 22:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * keep and please we should stop our bias here Yuckfoo 00:08, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Schools in India are just as important as schools elsewhere.--Centauri 21:54, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. nn school Tintin 23:17, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. All schools are notable enough for a truly great encyclopaedia. &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 20:58, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Factually accurate. --Oldak Quill 22:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.