Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugur Group Companies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Ugur Group Companies

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject doesn't seem to have had significant coverage in reliable sources. The existing source reads like a press release and apparently the only source that has significant coverage about this company, fails WP:GNG. Doesn't seem to have met WP:NCOMP. And then there's the problem of copy pasting. — UY Scuti Talk  17:49, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I have improved the copy and pasting problem and the one source problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badursun (talk • contribs) 17:58, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Those two are press releases, unfortunately..— UY Scuti Talk  18:10, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. — UY Scuti  Talk  19:43, 25 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  23:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * See my reply at the other DR. Revent talk 00:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep and improve : it's true that there is little coverage online in English for "Ugur Group", but searching Gnews for the company's real Turkish name "Uğur Grubu" I see sufficient coverage in WP:RS including in-depth articles in the national dailies Milliyet and Hürriyet. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 09:57, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It's nice we have sources in Turkish. However,I'd like to see the sources. Can you link them here, please? Thanks and regards— UY Scuti Talk  10:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've just added two to the article. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 10:18, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I've added some more sources and the official web sites under the group companies today.Badursun (talk) 11:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)badursun
 * There was a source about a tobacco company also named Ugur Grup. It is not this company so I changed it.Badursun (talk) 13:17, 28 January 2016 (UTC)badursun
 * Are you sure the sources you added are not a different company? ^^ — UY Scuti Talk  14:35, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Bloody hell. No, I assumed that it was part of the same conglomerate. In that case, as a non-native speaker of rather basic Turkish, I will withdraw my "keep" recommendation, and remain neutral for now. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
 * That's why I edited that conglomerate. 85.103.146.22 (talk) 12:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)badursun

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. 1500 employees is sufficiently large that sources can be expected to exist, and they do.  DGG ( talk ) 22:06, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  17:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I shouldn't have relisted this.. My bad. — UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  18:40, 8 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.