Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ugurhan Berkok


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Ugurhan Berkok

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An assistant professor, too soon for academic notability, with an h-index of only 3 on Google scholar. No other evidence of notability is present. Although there are enough links to save this from a BLPPROD, there are no real references. This was prodded by, I think correctly, but then immediately self-unprodded. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:28, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:PROF and subsequently WP:BIO. I thought it was borderline. So many of these new articles are terrible, that when review, you can't make your mind up if they are worth anything. The guidelines provide outlier help I think, but its eventually comes to judgement. scope_creep (talk) 00:53, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete and this was in fact PROD material as there's nothing close to substance at all. SwisterTwister   talk  01:05, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Far WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2017 (UTC).
 * Delete: TOOSOON and fails GNG and BIO. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 03:36, 8 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.