Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UiPath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

UiPath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Essentially every source here is a notice or press release, wherever published. There does not seem to be enough underlying importance to sugegst that the would be more.  DGG ( talk ) 02:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  16:05, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as I'm still not finding anything actually convincing at all. SwisterTwister   talk  18:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  18:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

RoboticRPA (talk) 15:35, 29 July 2016 (UTC) — User: (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep There are just 2 press release sources, that can easily be replaced. This is one of the few startups in Robotic Process Automation - a nascent industry that many industry pundits say it will have a huge impact on the future of work. There are news and coverings of the space every other day. This is covered by top tier consultancy companies like PwC, Deloitte, KPMG, Everest etc.. Here are some more sources/references:

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

Vladdione (talk) 09:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC) — User: (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep WP:ZEAL UiPath evolved from a Screen Scraping software to a full blown RPA (robotic process automation) platform. It is still one of the best Screen Scraping software out there. Just Google "screen scraping software" or "screen scraping". In this field it competes with the web based Import.io. Import.io has sources like its Crunchbase profile. UiPath also has it. In the RPA space it's main competitor is Automation Anywhere. This has even less sources. I'm not sure how compelling this arguments are, but it's more than "I'm still not finding anything actually convincing at all". Also this:


 * Inviting nominator for analysis for the sources listed, as I myself am going through them,  and  and these are either still essentially PR (note you have even included "customer" websites). What we need is actual coverage from news, it seems particularly none of the listed sources here are actually convincing. I have to also note that unacceptable sources also include interviews, social media, news about funding partnerships and finances. For example, also #6 by RoboticRPA is simply a Microsoft product listing.  SwisterTwister   talk  16:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * comment 1' First I'll discuss the arguments: "- a nascent industry that many industry pundits say it will have a huge impact on the future of work. There are news and coverings of the space every other day." is not evidence of the significance of the discussion about hte particular company. This is basically an argument that "I know its important"  DGG ( talk ) 00:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- coverage does not meet CORPDEPTH. Otherwise, an advertorial on an non notable company; sources are insufficient to sustain an encyclopedia article. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final Relist -- Dane 2007  talk 03:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Dane 2007  talk 03:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment -- the sources presented at this AfD are either PR, corporate blogs, directory listings, and otherwise generally non-RS or non-independent sources. It's all rather trivial, for example: "The Emerging Opportunities for Automating Enterprise Businesses", from SymphonyHQ with a link to the company's blog. This is telling us that this is an emerging industry, with companies doing a lot of PR and vying for funding, but not yet worthy of note by an encyclopedia. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:16, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment - I will also note this should been kept to be closed as Delete because the Keep comments cannot honestly actually be taken seriously, they are not convincing for establishing the needed substance. With this said, I hope this can get closer to an emphasized Delete.  SwisterTwister   talk  02:31, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Sorry, but this fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Many of the sources are either unreliable or redressed press releases or online magazines with limited readership. Slideshare is purely user submitted content ad is the wiki on Github. The few reliable sources I find simply talk about a partnership with another company and that too not in detail. I am unable to see any evidence that the company in notable. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.