Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UiTM Stadium


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Listed for 13 days with no arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

UiTM Stadium

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Previous removed by prod with this reason: no assertion of notability independent of the university Eeekster (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,   A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 18:18, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think it highly unlikely for a stadium not to be notable. Here there are sufficient sources to verify that the stadium exists and also some sources demonstrating the activities that have been held there: . I dare say if this were in the USA or UK there would be no question about having an article on it. So it must be here. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:10, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep (weak) he may have a point there. Checking 'Category:College_basketball_venues_in_the_United_States', the first one on the list is A._J._Palumbo_Center which only seats <5400 - about half the size of the stadium in question.  The Google news link he provided above mentions 'Five Nation' and 'Seven Nation' competitions held there (although it wasn't immediately obvious what nations or what sports, I'd suspect an international competition is pretty much by definition notable...).  Certainly, the article needs better references, but the stadium itself may well be notable. David V Houston (talk) 22:48, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Decent information. Not suitable for Wikipedia, but keep until someone can move it elsewhere.  See Alternative outlets for where to move it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:12, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.