Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Neo Nazism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:SNOW as an attack page. Bearian (talk) 22:47, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Ukrainian Neo Nazism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Attack page with unreferenced nonsense, WP:OR. It also goes without saying that neo-nazism could not have started in 1941 when the real Nazis were around. Sheesh. Historical engagements section is just baseless slamming of cities as "pro nazi". Delete ASAP Львівське (говорити) 16:52, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Strong delete: No references, no content, what little it does have isn't factual...If this is eligible for speedy delete, I'd say that. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 17:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong delete: I tried for speedy delete but the admin said the article didn't qualify for whatever reason...delete for what above said, also, user just left this note on my talk page so it the 'disruptive editing' notion applies more now, msg: "I have a lot of material about neo nazism in Ukraine, you seem to be pro of that kind, I will put this matter on wiki courts in order to make sure that you are biased and do not let others write which goes opposite to your ideas." --Львівське (говорити) 17:18, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, no references, poorly written, controversial title. Besides, I strongly doubt that there's a significant neo-Nazi movement in Ukraine, warranting a stand-alone article. Brandmeistertalk  17:27, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - very poor article with no salvageable text. It has been around for three days with no signs of improvement. The topic might be valid but if somebody wants to write an article on it the current article would be of no help Alex Bakharev (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing here that's salvageable. Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and start again -- This is a useless stub. I suspect that it is a left-wing POV of certain nationalist movements.  The topic has so much POV involved, particularly in the present political situation, that even the title is an ATTACK article.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can be recreated later with sources and a better title.  As it stands now, it's not even a useful start for a stub. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:46, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. A POV attack page.--Galassi (talk) 18:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)18:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. A disruptive POV page without sources. It's an attack page written to discredit Ukrainian protesters and justify Russia's recent invasion of Crimea. Calling dissidents and opponents "Nazi extremists" is one of Putin's favorite tactics.--Rurik the Varangian (talk) 01:17, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.