Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulmus 'Rageth'


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:31, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Ulmus 'Rageth'

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

When the description is "not available" and the pests and diseases section reads "no information available", you've got to ask yourself why anyone even made this article in the first place. Obvious GNG fail. Google is nothing but WP mirrors. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 23:42, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per Nom. Dictionary entries have their place but not here. --  Otr500 (talk) 02:12, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete to TNT until somebody finds information. Even those infamous mass-created sportspeople stubs were provided more info than this. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:20, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lack of sources means article subject fails WP:V and WP:N MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: I have tried very hard to find sources for this varietal but I cannot find any. It's not listed in the GRIN database, nor is it listed in the NC7 annual reports for the years 1953-1955. NeverRainsButPours (talk) 11:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.