Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Abyss (Royal Caribbean)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was draftify. Daniel (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Ultimate Abyss (Royal Caribbean)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article declined 5 times in the AFC process, moved by the original author into the main space with an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS argument bowing out of the AFC process. This does not qualify for a standalone article as it has not received enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. There are 2 references in the article which do help with some notability that may be worth adding some information into the Oasis-class cruise ship article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 16:05, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * I have tried improving the article many times. I took feedback, added sources, removed blog sources, all what I can to try to get it to be published. It gets dificult when they reject your draft and having to spend time fixing it only for it to be rejected again. If other users would help improve the article, that would be better ass I am only a single person. Please don't delete this article or the Viking Crown Lounge article.Angelgreat (talk) 16:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * The declines was probably a sign that the subject was not notable enough for it's own stand alone article. Article creation is one of the most difficult tasks on Wikipedia as most newer editors are not familiar enough with the policies of inclusion and sourcing. I don't think anyone could improve this enough to warrant its own article as I found, when I did my WP:BEFORE, there just isn't enough coverage. This isn't a reflection on you or the work you did but the subject itself. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:00, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok then, Could you move the article back to the Draft? Maybe later, it can be merged into the Royal Carribbean or Oasis class articles. Angelgreat (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.