Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Baseball Online 2006


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merge to Ultimate Baseball Online. I only tagged it for the merge, since I've no idea which parts would be considered relevant in the target article. - Bobet 09:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Ultimate Baseball Online 2006

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

You have to love the references section - every one a press release from the company. Free software, no evidence of importance or significance. RuneScape it is not. Guy (Help!) 21:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Trying again, eh? Keep, merge with Ultimate Baseball Online 2007 into Ultimate Baseball Online. Notable as the first Massively Multiplayer Online Sports Game (latest entry into the MMOSG triumvirate, after Massively Multiplayer Online Social Games and Massively Multiplayer Online Strategy Games]]). There are enough industry sources available to provide well-rounded coverage. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 01:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, Cleanup and Merge with Ultimate Baseball Online 2007 into Ultimate Baseball Online Appears to meet notability standards, however it reads like an advert and the same content is in 2 articles. It would be best to merge both 2006 and 2007 into the main Ultimate Baseball Online article, however it should also be cleaned up so that it doesn't read like an advert. Life, Liberty, Property 04:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge into Ultimate Baseball Online. No reason for it to exist away from its parent.  --T-dot (Talk | contribs) 18:35, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Page was blanked to an (almost) redirect. Reverted to previous until this is closed.  As to the status of the AfD, I'm recommending a Merge with the parent article as above, only insofar as to show the development of the series.  The development portion of the parent article maybe should be spun off into its own article, but thats another story all together, I suppose. Mystache 02:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.