Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Challenge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-08 09:17Z

Ultimate Challenge

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I think this is the same article that was previously speedily deleted as spam (G11). As I read it, it still qualifies (maybe even as unasserted significance (A7)). Anyway, I'm not sure what the notability criteria are for articles of this nature, so I wanted to have an AFD for it. --Pekaje 19:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - reinstatement of previously speedied material. +Hexagon1 (t) 09:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Speedy delete It was deleted according to the page log but can't read it. Failed google hits non notable.--Paloma Walker 02:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Is there a Pakistani Wikipedia? If so it might belong there, but seems unfit for the English Wikipedia. Anynobody 02:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete it's apparently a TV series, and might be notable, but at the moment it's totally unreferenced. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - Per Paloma Walker.-- Bryson { Talk } { Edits } 17:09, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note. The previously deleted article was very different to the present one- it was 2 lines and an external link. This is not a G4 candidate. WjBscribe 20:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.