Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Crossover Tournament Fighting

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. No such thing as speedy keep, folks. Woohookitty 02:21, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

Ultimate Crossover Tournament Fighting
Not notable. Psuedo-advertising.-- BMIComp (talk, HOWS MY DRIVING) 08:40, 23 July 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep. Very Successful E-federation that has been around for 7 years. pvegeta 09:06, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Note: this user is most likely a sockpuppet. The account was created within 15 minutes of this post and all its contributions are limited to voting on UCTF.
 * Keep and Expand.Yeah, 7 years is tons longer than most e-feds out there. It's got come of the most creative people on the net working on it.S3
 * Note: this user is most likely a sockpuppet. Actually, this isn't a sock puppet, becuase S3 is not an actual user account on wikipedia, a anon user (66.227.137.82) just signed S3.
 * Speedy Delete Unless someone proves to me the importance of this and can offer some proof other than the existence of a possibly obscure "convention" that takes place in Ohio. I find no references to this anywhere. Hamster Sandwich 09:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Addendum: I would site Example 1. under heading Articles of the WP:CSD page as the qualification for the speedy delete. And I must thank Splash for his help in directing me as per his critisism of my initial vote! Thank you so much! Hamster Sandwich 04:44, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as per above. UncleFloyd 14:06, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a hoax. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 17:17, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as Hamster Sandwich said. Balster neb 18:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable and in any case non-notable. Hamster Sandwich is wrong to suggest that either being a hoax or not being notable is a candidate for speedy. The WP:CSD do not allow either of those. Please do read policy before citing what you would like it to say. -Splash 23:07, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
 * If it can be confirmed as "patent nonsense" it can be speedied, however it is up to the nominator to demonstrate beyond doubt that it is patent. At the moment the claims in the article are just plain unverifiable. JamesBurns 03:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. 7 year running E-federation brings notable points of success including: The expansion of a close-knit community through the web, harboring a massive intake of fan-fiction creativity and juggling of many members for nearly a decade. LcwS


 * Speedy Keep This does not meet the deletion critieria, it is notable in the wealth of stories that it holds and has held for its duration. Since this page is NOT meaningless content or history, with text completely meaningless or unsalvageably incoherent. And no other deletion criteria can be associated with this I believe it should stay stay.Melvic
 * Delete as per Splash. Junkyard prince 23:17, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 03:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.