Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimate Ultimate 1995


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. There is, however, a reasonable consensus to merge the article to a list that does not currently exist; should such an article be written, that action should take place. Black Kite (talk) 10:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Ultimate Ultimate 1995

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This event fails WP:NOT, WP:EVENT, WP:SPORTSEVENT, and WP:NOTNEWSPAPER as there is no indication that the event has any enduring notability and lasting significance. Portillo (talk) 09:23, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 31.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  10:49, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Merge to newly created 1995 in UFC events. Nominator bulk nominated several of these with the exact same reasoning without considering a Multi-AfD.  Merging is better than outright deletion. Needs improvement in it's sourcing. Hasteur (talk) 12:15, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, or merge into a list article covering UFC events which aren't individually notable. The article as it currently stands makes no assertion of notability and lists no significant coverage in secondary sources apart from a posting on a wrestling blog site. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:20, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions.  Mt  king  (edits)  12:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete, or merge to year in type article as there is no claim to enduring notability (WP:NOT), no objection to on-mass move to area of WP:MMA so that merge can be performed. Mt  king  (edits)  12:32, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as notability is not temporary. Same with other early UFC event AfD nominations. Zeekfox (talk) 01:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep what looks like all 28 nominations, which appear disruptive to ongoing RFC on the topic. Sufficient coverage in Yahoo and other sources. Insufficient discussion or consensus on mass deletions. Merge to proper year "in UFC events" is possible. Guidelines mentioned by nom do not serve as deletion arguments when other keep arguments exist (based on both GNG and consensus to either keep or merge demonstrated at 5 years of similar debates). This boilerplate summary represents several much deeper issues that such a misguided nom doesn't address. Not watching. JJB 17:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Where on Yahoo!? What other sources?  Please let us know so that we can check. —Psychonaut (talk) 15:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep This is an obvious WP:POINTy nomination. Portillo actually disagrees with deleting these articles. He's only doing it out of frustration to make a point. Gamezero  05  00:36, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Even if the nomination was made in bad faith, some of the editors here have raised legitimate concerns about the article. There's no need to cut the discussion short now. —Psychonaut (talk) 07:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.