Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultimo (lingerie)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MuZemike 20:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Ultimo (lingerie)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

The article is a mix of a lingerie brand, and a BLP. Needs a rewrite to be even close to encyclopedic. Also, a lot of it is written like promotional material, for example: ''she decided while wearing a very uncomfortable cleavage enhancing brassiere that she could design something better which was: more comfortable better looking create more cleavage''

ƒ(Δ)² 14:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 11:14, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep but rewrite. Plenty of coverage is GNews, but a lot of work needs to be done. At the very least, get rid of all the WP:PEACOCK terms. At the most, get rid of the whole lot and leave a stub. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 11:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)


 * So... edit the article to improve it. I don't see any reason for deletion. Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Needs work not deletion, which achieves nothing except to reduce Wikipedia's completeness.  GQ sm Talk 16:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.