Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UltraPixel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to HTC One (device). ‑Scottywong | gossip _ 17:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

UltraPixel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Proprietary technology only used on "one" phone (pun intended), not yet independently notable. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:24, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. It's "featured" in a "flagship" product. I'm salivating too copiously to allow any further typing. -- Hoary (talk) 02:12, 26 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:06, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 March 4.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  00:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  00:30, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran  ( t  •  c ) 02:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to HTC One (device). It does have some press, but it's still not an independently notable technology, since it's only discussed in articles on the HTC One. If HTC use this in subsequent phones, it may end up deserving an article, but it's not uncommon for this sort of innovation to be nothing but a short-term marketing gimmick for a particular product, and the camera on the next phone to be completely different. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.