Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Beauty


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:07, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Ultra Beauty

 * – ( View AfD View log )

With just 2 high quality press mentions (one is at The Washington Post), both of which date back to 2017 and 2018, the band doesn't seem to pass WP:NMUSIC. Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. Bbarmadillo (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Uncontroversially unnotable. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:36, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Press coverage meets criteria 1 of WP:BAND.   Gamaliel  ( talk ) 12:01, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:BAND? We're looking at a 300 word short in WaPo noting they have just released an online single and being mentioned in a listicle in Paste Magazine counting as "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works"??? Just checkin'... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:22, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom .  the washington post call them .  new band in town  .  there are still new and upcoming , i see  NO evidence of Notability  Samat lib (talk) 19:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG and it is WP:TOOSOON. Missvain (talk) 21:32, 4 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.