Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Products


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 18:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Ultra Products

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Doesn't meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Not mentioned in Systemax article. Boleyn (talk) 21:26, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:48, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion.
 * Delete for lacking notability. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:59, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. The notability of this topic appears to be not notable at all: a source is literally just a patent, one is a court document, and both the Engadget articles are short and mean very little. Also, attempting to loo for sources only turned up unrelated topics. — CVValue (talk) 15:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non notable. Nitesh003 (talk) 13:37, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete None of the references meet the criteria for establishing notability as per WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 20:28, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.