Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultra Street Fighter 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Street Fighter IV. Recommendation to wait until more substantial and verifiable information about the game is reported. (non-admin closure) I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Ultra Street Fighter 4

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

It isn't. Search Ultra Street Fighter 4 Announcement Trailer on Youtube. --Mpolo44 (talk) 03:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Or even better: Ultra Street Fighter IV Will Be Out In 2014 --Mpolo44 (talk) 03:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect Article was clearly created only to round already existing redirect at Ultra Street Fighter IV to Street Fighter IV; nothing here the Arabic number article tells us that the redirected Roman numeral one doesn't.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 05:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect: Article should be created only when the amount of content merits it. Currently it obviously does not. Redirect to Super_Street_Fighter_IV:_Arcade_Edition. --uKER (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect: per UKER.  « Ryūkotsusei »  21:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to the same place as the alternative title Ultra Street Fighter IV. :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  12:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect - Very little content known yet, easily fits as a subsection at one of the other Street Fighter 4 articles. Sergecross73   msg me   15:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a significant update containing five new characters, one of which is completely new, six new stages, numerous balance changes, and all of the past DLC costumes included. If the Arcade Edition can have its own article, when all that contains is two new characters and two hidden characters made immediately playable, as well as numerous balance changes, then it makes no sense to delete this article. Christopedia (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Check the amount of content available about Arcade Edition. Now check the amount of content offered by the Ultra article. There's your reason for one deserving an article and not the other. When there's enough to be written about it, it shall get its article, but not before that. --uKER (talk) 19:21, 19 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. Of course. There are already About 4,620,000 results for the game, including lots of reliable sources. --Niemti (talk) 14:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * 4.5 million people reporting the game will be made doesn't mean it needs an article. From WP:CRYSTAL, "While Wikipedia includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable." Can it be any clearer? --uKER (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * And there are already tons of commentaries, responses, predictions, wish-lists, etc. Can I be any clearer? Also its now 200,000 more (after just few hours). And how to make an article about a fighting game update in development? Check out 100% mine Dead or Alive 5 Ultimate. --Niemti (talk) 22:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect. Only reliable info is its recent announcement and early 2014 release estimate. More info will come out in time, but until then, let's stay summary-style. If the DLC/standalone release is enough to build its own article (and it likely will be), break it out at that time. czar   &middot;   &middot;  23:14, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.