Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultralife Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 17:11, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Ultralife Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Advertising page for a non-notable corporation. All of the sources are listings or primary. Salimfadhley (talk) 13:55, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 17:31, 23 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  03:51, 24 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Sorry, I think this article is just a neutral description of a listed company, I didn't provide any business or revenue related information. Could you give me some advice about which descrition seems like advertisement to you so I can improve this article because its really informative for many potential readers who are interested in stock market about this company. Thx a lot for your help! Ice823cream (talk) 02:44, 25 December 2013 (UTC) Moved and reformatted. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  05:21, 25 December 2013 (UTC)


 * NOTE: This is one of 62 articles, all related, all  non-notable, and all  in  extremely  similar format that  are under investigation. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:40, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Shows absolutely no indication of meeting either WP:NCORP or WP:GNG John from Idegon (talk) 03:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.