Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ultrawave


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ansible. Daniel (talk) 04:54, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Ultrawave

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Unreferenced plot summary in the poor WP:IPC-violating style (list of media that mention the term ultrawave). The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Declined PROD. Per short discussion on talk, a redirect to Ansible seems like the best WP:PRESERVE option (ping User:TompaDompa), but since the prod decliner (User:Explicit) asked for WP:AFD, here we go. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Lists. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  03:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to the related term Ansible, as I suggested on the talk page. I have added a brief mention of this term there. TompaDompa (talk) 00:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ansible as the apparent term for it before "ansible" was coined, making it relevant for the latter term's history. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.