Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulubey canyon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Ulubey canyon

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources for verifiability despite claims of being "the world’s second longest canyon". Orphaned article with no external or inbound links whatsoever. Google yields little.  Flewis (talk) 11:42, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per my nom -- Flewis (talk) 11:43, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The Ulubey Canyon is mentioned in all these:, , , , , , which seem to back up the claim to being the world's second-largest canyon. I would guess that there are some good sources in Turkish, so I am inclined to keep this.--Michig (talk) 12:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * See also Google News results.--Michig (talk) 12:08, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * See also Google scholar results - the canyon appears to have considerable historical significance.--Michig (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The second site in Michig's list mentions the canyon in passing and doesn't appear to be authorative on the subject. They could well be republishing hearsay. - Mgm|(talk) 15:49, 2 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep based on Michig's numerous sources. Edward321 (talk) 15:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources back up the claim, which makes this a valid geographical location with potential for expansion. - Mgm|(talk) 15:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep as a well-verified major geographical feature - exactly the sort of thing encyclopedias are for. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:47, 3 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.