Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulugbekhon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close.. When all of the participants in a discussion (save one) have been sockpuppets and the one editor who isn't a sockpuppet didn't sign their opinion, I think it is time to close this discussion and start afresh with a new one. No penalty for starting a 2nd AFD after this closure. Liz Read! Talk! 23:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Ulugbekhon

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Promotional Does not meet BLP notability requirements Obscure sources el.ziade (talkallam) 17:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Uzbekistan,  and United Arab Emirates.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 18:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment - I’m not familiar with where the promotional point of view could be coming from. But subject article has gained significant coverage from reliable source which passes WP:GNG such as Daily Times (Nigeria), The Punch, San Francisco Examiner, Vanguard (Nigeria), Khaleej Times many but few to mention from my research on Google. Regarding the BLP notability, I think subject passes Basic criteria. Subject passes Keep and if sounds promotional other editors can help I think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EZYF (talk • contribs) 18:36, 18 January 2023 (UTC) —  is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. With the exception of the San Francisco Examiner piece, there's a total lack of either substantial coverage or reliable sources.
 * Keep The subject is notable and has gain enough independent reliable sources as I can see. although requires little cleanup and needs to be added in more categories related to the subject. --Kgbrrb54 (talk) 23:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per WP:BASIC - Also found some of this reliable sources useful which also meets WP:GNG
 * --Foodei564 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * --Foodei564 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * --Foodei564 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * --Foodei564 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
 * --Foodei564 (talk) 22:50, 25 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep Article biography doesn’t seems to be promotional, meanwhile it has been rated as start-class on its talk page . --Doctorlimp (talk) 18:59, 28 January 2023 (UTC) — is a confirmed sock puppet of . Spicy (talk) 22:19, 29 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.