Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulutiu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. (non-admin closure)  Rcsprinter   (Gimme a message)  @ 19:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Ulutiu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character does not establish notability independent of Dungeons & Dragons through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 00:29, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge into List of Forgotten Realms deities or delete. Not independently notable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * transwiki to some fansite that would love this trivia. As for Wikipedia, the subject fails WP:GNG all of the sources are primary, in which case the options are merge, redirect or delete. The suggested merge target is already bloated with primary sourced material, containing only one passing statement that might be considered referenced to the third party and so "merging" is essentially shoveling the shit from one corner of the stall to another. On the very long shot of a potential search term a redirect might be appropriate, but given we have been down that path already, the redirect should be locked. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  12:20, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Procedural close as redirect/merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. This article was initially merged to the above target by the nominator in September 2010;  the merge was reverted by an IP-only editor just over a year later.  This suggests tacit agreement that the redirect and merge was acceptable to the majority of editors associated with the wikiproject.  In my opinion, a return to the status quo would serve the encyclopedia better than a prolonged and potentially heated debate over each individual deity article. (Note: there are other similar article currently nominated for deletion; I will copy this !vote/recommendation to those affected as well.)Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 00:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.