Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umar Al Farook mosque


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  06:01, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Umar Al Farook mosque

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable place of worship Indiasummer95 (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 August 20.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  21:15, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tito ☸ Dutta 16:06, 27 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I think this is an image of it. Difficult for me to assess whether the project was notable and covered in Zambia. Candleabracadabra (talk) 04:16, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as a lack of coverage indicates a WP:GNG fail. That, and the nature of the article. The creator (who has been inactive for three years) actually noted who the muezzin is. Even at famous mosques, such information is usually only known (and cared about) by actual attendees - the article gives the appearance of a vanity project by an attendee irrespective of notability guidelines. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:55, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.