Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbrella Foundation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per CSD:A3. Stifle (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Umbrella Foundation
seems like vanity. Only two people in the organization. What do they do? Who are they? :-) musti 06:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable organisation/website WP:CORP & WP:WEB refer respectively. The website is a beta template with no content as of the time of writing.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   06:58, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Two employees? Blatant advertising with virtually zero content. Aplomado  talk 07:04, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Could have been speedied as Kevin 08:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable company, advertising. J I P  | Talk 08:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Its just a template and a slogan and nothing else. It's also a blatant advert. DannyM 09:42, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete too little content even for advertising. -- AlexR 11:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no point in its existence, it is just taking up space, there is no information there. Benjaminstewart05 12:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, advertising. DarthVad e r 14:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.