Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umbrella fund


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 02:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Umbrella fund

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Failing notability that contains a single source only. 🥒 Greenish Pickle! 🥒 (🔔) 12:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  15:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 02:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep but improve the article a lot. The concept of “umbrella fund” or “fund with sub-funds” is certainly notable in UK law.      . So meets WP:WEBCRIT. Contributor892z (talk) 05:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.