Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umesh Mehra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. No remaining arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure)  -- Lear's Fool 02:20, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Umesh Mehra

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Both Google News and Google searches return a reasonable number of passing mentions, but no coverage of sufficient significance to satisfy the general notability guideline. None of the mentions suggest anything that might meet the notability guidelines for creative professionals. -- Lear's Fool 11:26, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  --   -- Lear's Fool 11:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  --   -- Lear's Fool 11:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  — Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Having spent more time looking through search results, I have discovered a number of sources that I should have seen before the nomination (some of which I have added to the article), and am satisfied that their volume probably just barely meets the general notability guideline. Accordingly, I am withdrawing my nomination.  If anyone else still feels this article should be deleted, please say so, but if no such arguments come forward in the next day or so, I'll probably close as a speedy keep.  -- Lear's Fool 02:05, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and kudos to the nominator himself, as his own work is indicative that this one can best serve the project by remaining and being improved through regular editing.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:46, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.