Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umhlanga Lagoon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Umhlanga Lagoon

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable location. Dolphin ( t ) 06:46, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions.  Dolphin  ( t ) 06:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Many book sources. In addition of cited sources we have On route in South Africa by B. P. J. Erasmus, Reader's digest illustrated guide to the game parks and nature reserves of Southern Africa by Alan Duggan and Anthony Hocking, Discovering Southern Africa by Thomas Victor Bulpin, Hilary Rennie and Solveig Stibbe, South Africa's Top Sites by Philip Harrison, Traveller's guide to South Africa by Peter Joyce, Guide to Southern African Game & Nature Reserves by Chris & Tilde Stuart, Südafrika by Bernhard Abend and Achim Bourmer, Holiday-maker's guide to South Africa by Tim O'Hagan and more... I see it also mentioned in General History of Africa and The Cambridge History of Africa. Keep or, considering the actual article's size, Merge and Redirect to Umhlanga, KwaZulu-Natal. Cavarrone (talk) 07:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - As the nom has given zero rationale as to why this nature preserve is non-notable, I would say even speedy keep. The coverage is adequate for passing WP:GNG.--Oakshade (talk) 17:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep – The topic appears to meet WP:GNG per the sources in the article and those presented above by User:Cavarrone. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - per sources. Surely a pre-historic African site should at least make on English Wiki.Tamsier (talk) 07:34, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.