Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unavowed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. So Why  08:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Unavowed

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No references. Does not satisfy game notability as written. Google search finds many hits to the effect that the game exists and advertises itself, but no third-party discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:20, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I thought of correcting this article and not put it on WP:QD but Google search did not provide enough and convincing search reasons to improve it. Also the creator did not provide any sources to support content claims. Therefore, Delete. SkillsM674 (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - This should either have been moved to draft space or speedy deleted. I've found about 5 articles and/or reviews that could be used to expand the article, but it's clearly not fit for the encyclopedia in the state it's currently in. Nanophosis (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:04, 5 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep. It has 24 reviews on Metacritic; an abundance of RSes are therefore available. Phediuk (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per Phediuk. Sources exist, they just have to be added. Considering that Metacritic is the fifth Google hit and the third hit is this Rock, Paper, Shotgun review, I think this nomination is a spectacular WP:BEFORE failure. Regards So  Why  09:58, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I added a couple of clearly reliable sources to the talk page for further use per WP:POTENTIAL. They should be enough to expand the article. I'll see if I can do so myself later but you are all invited to do so as well. Regards So  Why  10:38, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: I fixed the article up with sources (will probably nominate it for WP:GA once I fixed the rest). Can you please withdraw this? Regards  So  Why  12:28, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Withdrawn because the defect has been cured by providing proper references. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.